Eric Zuesse
On Saturday April 2nd, CNN headlined,
“U.S. F-15s Deployed to Iceland,” and Zachary Cohen opened:
Demonstrating its commitment to a ‘free’ and ‘secure’ Europe, the United States deployed 12 F-15C Eagles and approximately 350 airmen to Iceland and the Netherlands on Friday, the Air Force announced.
U.S. aircraft units from the 131st Fighter Squadron at Barnes Air National Guard Base in Massachusetts and the 194th Fighter Squadron at Fresno Air National Guard Base in California will support NATO air surveillance missions in Iceland and conduct flying training in the Netherlands.
The F-15s are not the only package of American fighters being sent to Europe in an effort to deter further Russian aggression in the region.
Next to that text appears a
video from Christiane Amanpour, “Amanpour in Focus,” which opens with her saying:
Of all the crises plaguing Europe right now — Grexit, Brexit, the migrant crisis, the economy even still — the worst, by far, is the Ukraine-Russia crisis, which still has the potential to flare into open warfare beyond the borders of Ukraine; and who would have thought that in two thousand [inaudible]teen, we would still hear President Vladimir Putin sometimes raise the nuclear option. This extraordinary state of affairs has come from Ukrainians protesting for their independence — they saw off one President, and they elected another one, Petro Poroshenko.
Here’s the actual history behind all of that:
Back in February 2014, Obama
overthrew (please click on the link if you have any doubt about anything that’s being said here) the democratically elected President of Russia’s neighbor Ukraine, in an
extremely bloody coup, which was
at least a year in being set-up, and the rationale for this ‘democratic uprising’ was that that actually democratically elected President was corrupt — but no one mentioned that all of Ukraine’s post-Soviet leaders have
been corrupt. Obama’s agent
Victoria Nuland had instructed the U.S. Ambassador in Ukraine whom to get appointed to take over control of Ukraine as soon as the coup would be completed, and that person did become appointed — and top officials of the EU were
shocked to find out that it had been a coup. The
“armed militias in ski masks” that Obama referred to in
the coup (and in the
‘Anti Terrorist Operation’ afterward), were actually
his, not Viktor Yanukovych’s (the President whom Obama overthrew); they were America’s mercenaries, not either Yanukovych’s or Russia’s operatives as he pretends they were. And, now, after
the extremely bloody civil war that resulted in Ukraine when
the regions that had voted overwhelmingly for the President whom Obama overthrew rejected Obama’s coup-regime and refused to be ruled by it, Ukraine is
even more corrupt than it ever was, but, for some mysterious reason, the United States isn’t overthrowing the
post-coup government. Obama had gotten what he basically wanted out of his coup: Russia’s ability to pipeline its gas into the EU is now severely hampered by the necessity to establish alternate pipeline-routes. Ukraine is crucial to strangulating Russia, because most of Russia’s gas-pipelines into Europe run through its formerly friendly neighbor, Ukraine, which now is rabidly anti-Russian. So: the coup and
ethnic-cleansing and all the rest have been just a part of America’s effort to
strangulate Russia; and all of the maimed and dead people are merely collateral damage — no concern of Obama.
Obama lies about Russia and Ukraine and Crimea; and, the same aristocracy that control the U.S. government, control also the U.S. ‘news’ media, such as CNN; so, this is America’s
‘free press’, in America’s
‘democracy’: nonstop lies and propaganda, to fool the suckers to elect their candidates.
Consequently: when this CNN ‘news’ story said, “
The F-15s are not the only package of American fighters being sent to Europe in an effort to deter further Russian aggression in the region,” what was the source of the term, “aggression,” that was being used against Russia, there? It was, now, under Obama, the official U.S. government term to refer to Russia: for example, in Obama’s
National Security Strategy 2015, he had used that term
on 17 of the 18 times, when ‘aggression’ was being charged, in that document, against a foreign nation.
However, it’s not Russia that surrounds America with over 300 military bases in 185 foreign countries; it is the United States that
surrounds Russia with over 300 military bases in 185 foreign countries; and which, on top of this, has the nerve to accuse Russia as being the ‘aggressor,’ when Russia is merely defending Crimeans (and Russia’s own naval base) from America’s takeover of Ukraine — and allows Crimeans to plebiscite on
rejoining Russia after the U.S. coup in Ukraine. (Even
Western-sponsored polls in Crimea showed overwhelming support among them for rejoining Russia.) To add insult to injury, America then organizes global economic sanctions against Russia, for, essentially, defending Crimeans, and for defending itself, against
American aggression.
And, then, the American President has the arrogant audacity to proclaim that
“the United States is and remains the one indispensable nation,” meaning that not only Russia, but
every other country, is ‘
dispensable.’
It’s the official line. And America’s ‘news’ media promote it, unquestioningly (as if it’s not
outrageous).
And, if you ever wondered why people like
this get promoted at major ‘news’ media, while people like
this get the boot and are blackballed by them, you now know