смит
Мэтр
- Регистрация
- 17.07.2012
- Сообщения
- 24 058
- Реакции
- 8 778
The 2014 ruling was based on expert testimony that argued part of Zoltek's method was already known to scientists in that field at the time, making the patent invalid.Факт воровства не установлен. Для того и судятся, чтобы установить.
But the appeals court overturned that decision this month, saying the 2014 expert testimony was flawed based on evidence found in a 1987 letter from an engineer at Northrop Grumman, which built the B-2 bomber.
In that letter, the engineer contradicted the expert testimony, saying he had never seen a material such as the one owned by Zoltek.